People still read CW? It’s sad that the author of the CW arcitle chose such an adversarial approach in presenting his ideas, resulting in a followup discussion that degenerated almost instantly. Thanks to his approach, the discussion is now about censorship and personal credentials instead of technical architecture and solutions.You can be relevant because you solve a problem or because you are picking a fight. Keep solving problems.
mobile version
People still read CW? It’s sad that the author of the CW arcitle chose such an adversarial approach in presenting his ideas, resulting in a followup discussion that degenerated almost instantly. Thanks to his approach, the discussion is now about censorship and personal credentials instead of technical architecture and solutions.You can be relevant because you solve a problem or because you are picking a fight. Keep solving problems.